Are you listening to the emerging counter-cultural stories?
(Posted 25th March 2019)
Creating brand’s cultural relevance through contradictions
(Posted 07th March 2019)
Why creative briefing doesn't work
(Posted 02nd October 2018)
Accidental brilliance? Looking at #Dhara Jalebi 20 years later
(Posted 16th December 2016)
The clash of Indian masculinities
(Posted 5th November 2014)
Is the future of big brand ideas dark?
(Posted 5th September 2017)
Isn’t it time the hotel industry borrowed a trick from Airbnb?
(Posted 29th July 2018)
A different kind of a hero
(Posted 8th March 2017)
Gol gappas or gold medals? Which side of #Dangal are you on?
(Posted 1st January 2017)
Strategic importance of vulnerability
(Posted 28th June 2016)
Anushka’s trolling comes from innate cultural belief
(Posted 15th May 2016)
Goose pimple stuff: All time awesome campaigns in India – I
(Posted 15th May 2016)
Well played sir!: All time awesome campaigns in India – II
(Posted 15th May 2016)
Mobiles, mobility and the importance of guilt
(Posted 15th May 2016)
Where in the food chain is your food brand?
(Posted 12th February 2014)
Return of the angry young man
(Posted 4th January 2015)
Amul – ye butter hai ya twitter?
(Posted 18th December 2014)
Who’s your enemy?
(Posted 15th November 2014)
Six pack abs, designer stubbles and tattoos
(Posted 18th September 2014)
Are we falling in love with Samsung`s geeky authenticity over Apple`s hype?
(Posted 12th September 2014)
Is your brand missing in your brand’s social media strategy?
(Posted 15th April 2014)
Brand rejuvenation: is your brand trapped?
(Posted 27th March 2014)
Aren’t the new age brands being outdated in their brand thinking?
(Posted 12th February 2014)
Why brand managers should spend more time on jokes and cartoons…
(Posted 25th March 2014)
Why the cricket team’s loss bothers the parent in us
(22nd January 2012)
Shallow shlacking: why Hindu’s campaign gets the buzz
(Posted 1st February 2012)
Shall we stop targeting our audience now
(5th February 2012)
How do you sleep at night?
(17th June 2012)
Is there a problem in your insight?
(25th January 2012)

Why creative briefing doesn`t work


Why creative briefing doesn`t work

The Angry Young Man image and stories created by Salim-Javed have been much analysed over the years by experts. Its ability to reflect the sense of betrayal & angst of the common man due to the perceived failure and corruption of the government has been attributed to its resounding success. In his interviews later, however, Javed Akhtar has said they did not really think of it this way while creating the stories.

This is a pattern that often repeats itself.

The post analysis of great creative work invariably reveals deeper insights than what the creators themselves used to present their creation initially. Resulting in a questioning of the analysis itself. The analysis is often accused of unnecessary hair splitting because ‘the creator never saw it this way’.

To my mind, it does not discredit the post analysis. It perhaps points out that the creator may not always be consciously aware of the insights his/her creation is based on.

Which is why, creation and analysis are two separate abilities, not everyone has both of them.

More importantly, great creative work is often instinctive and ‘inspired’. It resonates with the creator (and the audience) before and maybe without an overt explanation of why it does so.

This perhaps points out an inherent ‘flaw’ in the briefing process designed by marketing teams, research and advertising agencies.

The briefing process is a rather conscious handing over of insights from brand teams, research agencies and servicing/planning teams to the creatives. And the former is rather surprised that their carefully researched and crafted insights they feel very excited about, does not evoke an equally enthused response from the latter. Even if it does (sometimes under pressure knowing the client is watching), it does not come through in the subsequent work.

This is because three things are missing in the process.

One, the insight needs to be the creator’s own. It takes a big coincidence for creators to find personal resonance with handed over insights, uncovered by someone else.

Secondly, the excessively conscious analysis of the insight robs it of the magic. Building forward from the insight to a story that ‘includes’ the insight becomes a mathematical exercise creating uninspiring, disjointed work.

And thirdly, everyone has their own definition of what an insight is anyways!

Is it any surprise then that planners are often scrambling to ‘retro-fit’ insights to present the work the creatives have come up with? Trying hard to make a connection between the client brief, research findings and the work on hand.

Maybe we need to rethink the process a bit. Allowing some scope for accidental stumbling upon great stories and evaluating them for insight fit LATER. Scary, right? But stay with me here.

What is important is for the creatives to understand the ‘person’ they are writing for by themselves. Their lives, concerns, anxieties, hopes, dreams, fantasies. And figure out how they will sell to this person.

Parallely, the strategic team can deep dive to understand important insights, not for briefing, but for post evaluation of creatives. If stories that sound great instinctively also align with insights the strategic teams know, its time to green light the work. If it is a minor misalignment, it can be taken care of.
I know, ‘hiding’ insights from creatives till they present work sounds like a crazy idea. You can argue with it.

Or, you can enjoy a great movie this weekend and read all the analysis about what made it great later :-)